Healthcare should always be funded by government, and would always be free for people to use. How far do you agree or disagree with this statement ?

Nobody can deny that a free health care system wholly funded by the government can be responsible for an all-round welfare of people in nation extent.

However

, it seems to me that there is a impractical issue to reach all of people who admire the idea. The main obstacle is an inflexible requirement of balance between taxpayer who need to fund

this

health care budget and demand for recipients of

this

operation, resulting amount of investment from authorities more restricted and declined. For

this

reason, it might be said that some countries where is not capable of overcoming an intolerable high cost of treatment and ambulance performance are claimed that consistent fluctuation of economic condition is dominating for long-term, and

thus

notoriously affect their population age and index of satisfaction. A

further

issue related to an overwhelming expenditure of modern medicine, which is itself makes more possible consumption due to the progressive growth of qualification, especially in some states where older people are prevailing. One final point against

this

proposal is the added issue of globalization, meaning that immigrants of overseas can move freely, and

thus

influence negatively in their adopted country's politics and financial circumstances by ameliorating health-based policy. Admittedly, I agree with those who support the argument that professional medical organization is a worthy ambition for a country, and it is necessary to achieve

this

goal.

However

,

this

aspiration will apparently suffer to some extent when confront with practice in real life. To summerize, it is reasonable that no matter how essential to people publicized health-related organs are,

this

needs to contribute by the way rediscover other types of insurance

such

as private choice.