Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Introduction: It is believed for governments that investment in the railways is more advisable than roads.

This

essay strongly agrees with

this

opinion and justifications are as follows. Primarily, travelling by train is extremely safer than by any other means of ground transportation. As an explanation, trains ride on the railways,

this

means that there are no other vehicles travelling on its way, leading to a significantly lower chance of accidents than cars, buses, which are driven on roads.

Therefore

, by improving railways, governments will provide a safe system and encourage people to use trains for transportation more, which will result in a decrease in the accident rate in the nation.

For example

, statistics from a scientific report have shown that the number of crashes caused by trains is remarkably less than that of buses, cars, motorbikes.

In addition

to

this

, improvements on railroads will

also

reduce air pollution. To be specific, it is known that traffic jams and traffic lights are the most significant factors causing high consumption of fuel for road travelling automobiles.

Nonetheless

,

this

is not the case for travelling on the railways.

This

implies that travelling by trains will reduce the emission of poisonous gases into the atmosphere of the cities.

As a result

, by upgrading the system, governments could attract people to use

this

method to travel more, leading to a potential drop in air pollution.

For instance

, measurements in a city where people have been shifting to travelling by

this

way has shown improved air quality. Conclusion: In summary, it is agreed that money should be spent on railways

instead

of roads due to the benefits in travel safety and environment protection.

Thus

, it can be predicted that there would be more trains in the future.