Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that free social activities should be a mandatory part of high school programs. While students who take part in these activities may face some unexpected issues, I agree that educators should design required
community
services for their high school students without any payments. On the one hand, the most considerable trouble affects students when participating in public activities is the shortage of time. Particularly, they may be less focused on their core lessons in class, even lack leisure time because of spending too much time for
community
services.
Besides
, there are obligatory services which do not suit to everyone.
For example
, working for a charity at mountainous places or suburban areas requires students to have to go far away or teaching sports to younger children at outdoor stadium demands a good health. All of these types of work do not fit
to
Suggestion
for
the weak girls or unhealthy students.
On the other hand
, attending unpaid public services will bring great benefits to high school students.
Firstly
, these programs create a positive environment for students to be raised in a holistic way, not only improving their social knowledge but
also
motivate their perception about the outdoor life.
This
is really an appropriate method to train them on how to work for the interest of
community
instead
of living only for themselves.
Secondly
, taking part in public activities
such
as
volunteer campaigns
Accept comma addition
volunteer, campaigns
and charity organizations is a highlighted point which makes
their
objective case of they
them
resume brilliant. If an applicant who has the same qualification, as well as experiences with other candidates, would like to apply for a scholarship or a competitive job, his past activities
for
Suggestion
in
the interest of
community
Suggestion
the community
may make an outstanding contribution in helping him defeat the others. To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons.
Therefore
, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on
this
subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of
this
, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: