The government should control the Internet to reduce cyber-crime and ensure safety of users. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the modern world, many governmental organizations, especially executive branch is willing to control the social sites users in order to provide safety and prevent cybercrime on the net.

However

, there are certain disadvantages of these initiatives,

such

as breaking the human rights and freedom of speech. Personally, I believe that social networking sites should be out of the government interventions. On the one hand, some administrative workers and government officials can use personal dates of the network users for their own purposes. Money laundering and corruption rate may be increased because of stealing the personal dates.

Moreover

, government can block the internet.

For example

, during the demonstration in the

last

summer in Kazakhstan, some certain YouTube channels were blocked by the authorities, and these actions make society more irritated, leading to

further

rallies in the future.

On the other hand

, it is true that the administration can provide safety for internet users. In

this

regard, they can filter some resources.

For example

, some sites on the network may trick users, and authorized bodies can block them.

Moreover

, it is clear that online crime is high in some countries, because of inadequate systems of cyber security, leading to losing money and dates. In

this

regard, some people believe that there should be administrative control over the users. In conclusion,

although

competent authorities can reduce the level of cybercrime, it can be manageable though the controlling the internet, leading to stealing personal dates.

In addition

to

this

, it can be utilized in the political sphere too.