Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The male to female ratio in universities has been a widely discussed topic for decades and sometimes even centuries. In my opinion, a gender inequality is hardly eradicated by imposing a 50/50 split in every subject. The progressive world hails meritocracy, which rewards people of any gender or origin for who they are and not what they were born as. After all, the key idea behind the feminist movement is getting the society to perceive women as equals after centuries of oppression. Allocating guaranteed spots to women based on a pre-determined set of chromosomes from before they were born hardly solves the problem.

However

, I have to concede than artificial tweaks to the gender ratio in universities is necessary in some cases and may be for the better. It is common knowledge that Japanese universities have a

disproportionally

out of proportion

disproportionately

high number of male students relative to female learners. The anomaly is all but subjective: high school exam numbers indicate a suspiciously bad conversion of high-scoring female graduates into Freshwomen. A gradually decreasing share of guaranteed spots for females would assist millions of female hopefuls and open

unviersities'

Suggestion

university's

universities

university

eyes to what they have

been been

have the quality of being; (copula, used with an adjective or a predicate noun)

been

missing out on. All in all, I do not believe that enrolling one

women

Suggestion

woman

for one

men

Suggestion

man

in every subject is what will give men and women the same weight in modern society.

Nevertheless

, I can see where a similar measure is desperately needed and can change things for the better. In some cases, one may argue that a mandatory 50/50 split

certianly

definitely or positively ('sure' is sometimes used informally for 'surely')

certainly

will not make things worse.