Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both viewpoints and then give your opinion.

The development of mankind has a detrimental effect on the flora and fauna of the globe.

Therefore

,

this

development leads to

such

procedures which are not reversible. But, some people criticize

this

whole scenario by saying that proper ways are required to stop

this

impact. I personally believe that the plants and the animals are as important as the humans, so some kind of action is required in

order

to save these creatures.

This

essay will discuss both the views by using the examples of the Oxford University research and the Times Magazine survey to demonstrate the points and support the claims. On the one hand, people think that nothing in

this

sphere is without purpose. And In

order

to cope the needs of increasing

population we

Accept comma addition

population, we

have to compromise on the resources of the world.

Furthermore

, it’s not easy for people to leave their luxury

life styles

a manner of living that reflects the person's values and attitudes

lifestyles

for the sake of saving planet species.

For example

, Oxford University in 2015 researched that in the

last

10 years 1000 species of plants and animals becomes extinct from

this

planet, in

order

to address the needs of

this

globe. So, from

this

example, it is clear that our non-changing routines are destroying some valuable species, which is in fact an alarming situation.

On the other hand

, some people

favor

promote over another

favour

that we have to change our routines in

order

to save our planet flora and fauna. And

this

is only possible, if our governments start taking

this

issue on the serious note.

Additionally

, it is the responsibility of the people to decrease the use of those products which are affecting our ecosystem.

Similarly

, a survey of the Times Magazine highlights the same issue in 2018 and 80% people voted in the

favor

promote over another

favour

of saving the endangered creatures. So, from

this

example, it is clear that we need some strict actions in

order

to save our flora and fauna. To conclude, collaborate actions are required from the governments and the general public in

order

to provide protection to the ecosystem. In the future, if the governments don’t gather on the agenda to save our world ecosystem, it will have detrimental effects on our globe.