Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Medicines always have a side effect. Many individual argue that testing of new medicine will help human, if they are checked on other species before providing it for human consumption, while others believe that it is wrong to do so. In

this

essay,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

will talk about both sides of the argument before giving my view. On one hand, medicines are

helpul

providing assistance or serving a useful function

helpful

in fighting all types of diseases. There are many common

illness

Suggestion

illnesses

like cold and flu, which can be treated with ease using a basic tablet.

Hence

, there is no need to test

such

medicines once the formula is already proven. To illustrate, paracetamol is a proven drug for fever,

thus

there is no point experimenting it on rats to check.

However for

Accept comma addition

However, for

few new drugs these

test

Suggestion

tests

needs

Suggestion

need

to be done, as it impacts the larger audience.

On the other hand

, saving human life is above all. Humans are behind the development of all the scientific and medical advancement, which are helping the world to be a better place.

For example

, medicine named

gesdone

, which was out in the market without testing and took many

life

Suggestion

lives

of young individuals.

Thus

, it is really important to check for side or any harmful effects, before releasing it for consumption. To conclude, checking medicines for consumption is important. It is better to use it on other species rather than mankind, as

this

will not impact any laws or society. Whereas, the number of experiments should be decreased overall to conserve all.