Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both of these two views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some would argue that the same kind of punishment has to be executed for all

committers

a special group delegated to consider some matter

committees

knitters

of

crime

, while others believe it is fairer to consider the circumstances and reasons before the judgment.

This

essay will argue that

one

penalty for all sins can be appropriate to some extent but, incidents in which

crime

has occurred should evaluate

first

. On the

one

hand, some people say, judging all criminals with the same judgment, is more potent in reducing numbers of crimes. A

pickpocketer

shall be treated equally like a murderer in all circumstances.

As a result

, people beware before committing any offence and think multiple times about its consequences.

For example

, in Ethiopia, a fixed judgment of all criminals is prisoned for twenty five years, regardless of their age, mental, and psychological health.

However

, I believe

one

sentence for every offender makes them deceived, cheated and depressed and becoming more violent and notorious.

On the other hand

, taking the criminal's motive and the

crime

situation into consideration before sentencing them is an essential part of the criminal judicial

system

. The respected judges should patiently hear every criminal perspective and understand them, which will prevail in transparent justice. Transparency in the legal

system

allows criminals to deter antisocial

behavior

manner of acting or controlling yourself

behaviour

and helps them to be a lawful citizen.

For instance

, a murderer who killed someone for any external gain like money or

jewellry

an adornment (as a bracelet or ring or necklace) made of precious metals and set with gems (or imitation gems)

jewellery

should be punished differently than

one

who did

murder

Suggestion

the murder

in self-defence. Transparency in the judicial

system

allows criminals to deter antisocial behaviour and helps them to be lawful citizens.

Therefore

,

Accept space

,

I believe

this

method is preferable because it caters to the actual problem well and solidifies people's confidence and trust in the judicial

system

. In conclusion,

although

sentencing

committers

a special group delegated to consider some matter

committees

of any

crime

, in the same way, it makes criminals more violent.

Therefore

, I believe understanding by the judges the people's motives, and the situation of the offence will curb the

crime

effectively.

Moreover

, upon release, it helps to make them a law abide citizens.