Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with essential assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that rich nations should allow more refugees to seek asylum and should help them with the necessities of life, like food and shelter.

This

essay agrees with the statement because helping people is the right thing to do, and

also

accepting refugees increase the

workforce

for

Suggestion

in

the country. To help someone in need is the greatest thing one can do. Most refugees flee from their countries due to persecution and barbarism they have to face. It is because few countries are extremists in beliefs, and the minorities are left to suffer and are not provided with the fundamental rights necessary to live a good life. Developed nations could help these people by accepting them and giving them the right to work and make a better living.

For example

, Canada took 50,000 immigrants in the form of refugees from Syria at the time of civil war prevailing there. Another way that the refugees contribute to any nation is by increasing the

workforce

. The

workforce

is one of the essential parts of any country's development, and letting refugees in

brings

Suggestion

bringing

the increase in the

workforce

, and

as a result

, more progress could be made as a nation.

For example

, 40% of Canada's

workforce

at the

laborer

someone who works with their hands; someone engaged in manual labor

labourer

level consists of immigrants, and most of them being refugees and

hence

making the refugees as an essential factor in the road to development. In conclusion, I think prosperous nations should take in more refugees because of the reasons that it is

the more humane

Suggestion

the most humane

thing to do, and

also

this

leads to the increased

workforce

, which leads to more production and

hence

prosperity.