Some people feel the it always wrong to keep animals in captivity, for instance, in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for he animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate and give your opinion.

It is debatable issue that should people preserve animals away from their natural

habidats

the type of environment in which an organism or group normally lives or occurs

habitats

or not interfere the

nature

at all. While some people argue the process of keeping animals in special zones built by humans in order to protect them,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

tend to agree with others who

ackowledge

declare to be true or admit the existence or reality or truth of

acknowledge

the necessity of taking care of animals, even by reducing their freedom.

To begin

with positives, it is

quiet

to a degree (not used with a negative)

quite

obvious that some

involments

a person who supplies information

informants

made by people to the environment might have a detrimental effect on the whole ecosystem.

In other words

, if scientist

Suggestion

, if a scientist

start

Suggestion

starts

to isolate some

indangered

(of flora or fauna) in imminent danger of extinction

endangered

species in order to protect them, they will may interrupt environmental circulation.

As a result

, the

nature

will probably lose its balance and some severe diseases can spread all over the world. For

instanse

an occurrence of something

instance

instances

, a couple of

centures

a period of 100 years

centuries

ago one of

european

of or relating to or characteristic of Europe or the people of Europe

European

country decided to eliminate the amount of cats in the city's streets, and

this

trend lead to appearing severe diseases among people through increased

level

Suggestion

levels

of rats, as

cats

Suggestion

the cats

were

natural barier

Suggestion

a natural barrier

natural barrier

natural barriers

in balancing the quantity of rats, so without them there was no obstacle in front of the rats.

However

, the less people do in

favor

promote over another

favour

of protecting animals that can be extinct in

near future

Suggestion

the near future

, the more are chances that many species will die out. Many governments

has begin

Suggestion

have begun

to use animals as a source of gaining revenue,

such

as demonstrating them in zoos for

fixed fee

Suggestion

a fixed fee

.

Moreover by

Accept comma addition

Moreover, by

creating a place similar to

natural habidats

Suggestion

the natural habitats

natural habitats

of animals, the authorities tend to smooth the isolating process and

make

engage in

do

less harm to the

nature

, as animals will still run and smell fresh air but in special zones which is safe for them.

For example

, there are a lot of natural parks where live a vast variety of endangered species away from the risk of starving and

desiases

an impairment of health or a condition of abnormal functioning

disease

, and in an emergency cases vets will able to give

first

aid to animals, as they will be located much closer to people. In conclusion,

although

isolating animals from their natural places of living may bring some serious natural catastrophes as the consequence of interfering the

nature

's balancing process, it will be

quiet

to a degree (not used with a negative)

quite

beneficial for

government

Suggestion

the government

to use them as a source of income and for animals

also

, because these places will be well-equipped with vets and away from food providing problem.