Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Many individuals claim that the

government

's allocation for the arts is a waste fund, and

this

could have utilized for something else. I completely disagree with

this

viewpoint because providing financial benefits for

this

field will encourage the artists to produce quality output, and it will help to inherit the skills to the

next

generation.

To begin

with, providing sufficient financial resources on artwork by the authorities gives an extra force for the producers to perform well.

In other words

, when the artist possesses a better financial background, he will be able to find the most suitable raw materials for his piece of art so that he could provide what exactly his followers are looking for.

For instance

, many people in society have the ability of music, but they cannot join the industry as they are not able to afford the fundamental costs. When a country has the budget to help these people, it will be an invaluable input for the field

in particular

.

Besides

, utilizing the

government

's fund to purchase necessary instruments for the schools allows children to enhance their skills at the early stage.

This

will ensure that children have the opportunity to sharpen their abilities with the use of the latest equipment before becoming adults. The

government

of Sri Lanka,

for instance

, has a separate allocation to enhance the skills of youngsters. By doing

this

, the education ministry expects to get more art students for the universities who will pass out as

knowledgeful

artists eventually. In conclusion, even though it is believed by many that the

government

is wasting money on the arts, it is an indispensable input

for

Suggestion

from

the artists to address the audience in a way they are expecting and

also

this

will ensure society gets more skilful artists in the long run.