Some people believe the government should spend money on building trains and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion

The methods of mitigating
traffic
congestion
have been a heated topic of controversy.Some people argue that the construction of larger roads is the answer for the problem.
However
, I contend that
such
a solution is ineffective in the long term, while the opinion to construct railways and subways is a far better measure. There is a common fallacy that governmental spending on building larger roads could address the problem of
traffic
congestion
. An increase in road size could reduce the
traffic
intensity in the short term, but larger roads
also
mean that the citizens are barely encouraged to purchase more individuals' vehicles.
This
leads to the fact that the larger roads would soon be filled with intense
traffic
again.
For instance
,
traffic
jams still exist in several cities, even after they expanded the roads
last
year. In brief, if
this
was the accurate solution,
traffic
jams would not still persist in the long run. Rail and subways,
however
, could ensure that
traffic
congestion
is properly addressed.Unlike cars and buses, trains are capable of transporting thousands of people simultaneously at a time and
thus
would meet the transport demand of a vast number of passengers.
Moreover
, trains do not have to go through the intersections and
traffic
lights and dedicated lines ensure their travel is being hardly interrupted.
In other words
, trains are always on time, regardless of the level of
traffic
.
This
level of punctuality would encourage many to choose railways and subways as their primary means of transport, and the number of individual vehicles decreases
accordingly
.
As a result
,
traffic
congestion
could be tackled successfully. As to conclude, the above facts evidently elaborate that, building more and larger roads is an unsustainable measure, while train and subways would be a much more effective solution for the problem of
traffic
congestion
.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: