Fossil fuels are the main source of energy in many countries. However, in some countries, alternative sources of energy are encouraged. Do you think this is positive or negative development?

These days, fossil fuels are known as significant resources of

energy

;

however

, alternative sources

such

as

wind

and solar

energy

are utilized in most developed countries like the USA, Japan. As far as I am concerned,

this

tendency brings about more positive effects than negative ones. On the negative side, solar and

wind

energy

depend

Suggestion

depends

on whether. In windless countries obtaining

this

type of

energy

is implausible;

therefore

, it is common for certain countries.

Moreover

, most new

energy

sources are costlier than conventional ones.

For instance

,

majority

Suggestion

the majority

a majority

of poor countries use fossil fuels for their cost

,

Accept space

,

although

they are aware of damage of them. In spite of the evident drawbacks, I still believe that usage of alternative sources has more benefits for governments and people. The major advantage of it is that

wind

and solar have less harm than fossils.

That is

to say, if the countries use these sources

,

Accept space

,

their people will be healthy.

For instance

, oil and coal

energy

release a large amount of toxic which cannot be emitted by the alternatives.

Furthermore

, production of

wind

an solar

energy

is considerably easier than traditional sources like oil and natural gas. There are lots of steps in producing fossils, but gaining alternatives is much more uncomplicated. By way of conclusion, I believe that the merits of utilizing alternative sources of

energy

are of more significance when it is compared to demerits. From my personal perspective,

this

trend should be prevail the whole world.