As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

#safety #importance #test #products #animals #life #risk

The testing of new products on animals is controversial. Some people claim that in view of public safety, it is essential to test these new products on animals. These people

also

feel that

instead

of putting human

life

at risk, it is better for a few animals suffer by untested products. I completely agree with

this

statement.

Firstly

, few animals has the same genetic configuration as that of humans.

Hence

their manifestations are similar to the humans.

For instance

, injection insulin is a

life

saving drug for diabetics. It was released to the public, only after testing on animals for immediate and delayed manifestations. Perhaps, millions of people would have succumbed to diabetes, if

this

life

saving drug was not tested on animals.

Therefore

, to attain utmost safety for millions of people any new drug or product must ensure adequate testing on animals, which are genetically similar to human genome.

Secondly

, humans are allergic to certain chemicals and they are prone to anaphylactic shock, which can cause death instantly.

For example

, certain untested perfumes or deodorants can result in severe

life

threatening allergic reactions.

Moreover

, if some animals are sacrificed while testing, it has indirectly saved lives of thousands of people. Because,

such

products will not be released into the market. Overall, humans can be at risk, if they are using products, which are not tested adequately. In conclusion, many human lives can be protected, if the new products undergo prior adequate animal testing.

Finally

, harming few animals is better than risking the human

life

Submitted by dr.seemav on Sat Jan 04 2020

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

12Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

255 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 9.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

Topic Vocabulary:

public safety
untested products
animal welfare
moral implications
scientific validity
alternative methods
regulations
ethical considerations
technological developments
public sentiment
activism
societal values

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

5.5
band
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In the past five decades, there has been a remarkable surge in the migration of people from rural to urban areas. While some may argue in favor of this trend, I firmly contend that the drawbacks associated with it far outweigh the benefits. Two primary reasons support this contention.
6
band
Animals are in danger of extinctions. Some people say we should protect only those animal which are useful to humans. Do you agree or disagree ?
Have you ever thought that our lives would be in danger if we did not try to save animals' lives? undoubtedly, animals are important as humans, so they should have the right to live not to die Unfortunately, some people believe humans should just preserve animals that they need. In my opinion, is not fair to let them die, because we think they are not gainful.
7
band
Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job trainning are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
The view that education and job training are more beneficial to criminals than imprisonment is one I can only partially agree with, for several reasons which will be discussed in the following essay.
5.5
band
you ordered an item from an online shop three weeks ago. The shop said you would get the item two days later but you have not received it yet. Last week you sent an email about the situation to the shop, but you did not receive a reply. Write a letter to the manager. In your letter explain the situation complain about the bad service ask for immediate delivery of your order or your money back You should write at least 150 words.
I am Sarah, one of your customers, I am writing this letter to share my dissatisfaction about your service in my previous purchase and to gather some information about my order.
4.5
band
Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the life of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will. To what extent do you agree of disagree?
There is an ongoing debate regarding which techology is best. A majority of people believe that the technological developments which had happened in the past had changed the life of common individuals and had numerous merits compared to recent developments and the new technology will be inferior to the past 's. However I completely oppose this view and my stance is discussed in the following paragraphs.

As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Animals are in danger of extinctions. Some people say we should protect only those animal which are useful to humans. Do you agree or disagree ?

Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job trainning are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?

Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the life of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will. To what extent do you agree of disagree?