As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

#safety #importance #test #products #animals #life #risk

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

The testing of new products on animals is controversial. Some people claim that in view of public safety, it is essential to test these new products on animals. These people

also

feel that

instead

of putting human

life

at risk, it is better for a few animals suffer by untested products. I completely agree with

this

statement.

Firstly

, few animals has the same genetic configuration as that of humans.

Hence

their manifestations are similar to the humans.

For instance

, injection insulin is a

life

saving drug for diabetics. It was released to the public, only after testing on animals for immediate and delayed manifestations. Perhaps, millions of people would have succumbed to diabetes, if

this

life

saving drug was not tested on animals.

Therefore

, to attain utmost safety for millions of people any new drug or product must ensure adequate testing on animals, which are genetically similar to human genome.

Secondly

, humans are allergic to certain chemicals and they are prone to anaphylactic shock, which can cause death instantly.

For example

, certain untested perfumes or deodorants can result in severe

life

threatening allergic reactions.

Moreover

, if some animals are sacrificed while testing, it has indirectly saved lives of thousands of people. Because,

such

products will not be released into the market. Overall, humans can be at risk, if they are using products, which are not tested adequately. In conclusion, many human lives can be protected, if the new products undergo prior adequate animal testing.

Finally

, harming few animals is better than risking the human

life

Submitted by dr.seemav on Sat Jan 04 2020

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

12
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 9.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

4 paragraphs

255 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

Topic Vocabulary:

public safety
untested products
animal welfare
moral implications
scientific validity
alternative methods
regulations
ethical considerations
technological developments
public sentiment
activism
societal values

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

8
band
The parents of your Australian friend Chris have invited you to a surprise birthday party for him/her. Write a letter to Chris's parents. In your letter ·say why you think Chris will enjoy the surprise party ·explain why you won't be able to attend the party ·give details of a plan to see Chris at a different time
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Brown,
6
band
In many countries people use electric devices for daily house chores while some think it is an expensive energy source and we ought to use gas instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.?
Nowadays, some individuals use heaters, spoils... etc for cooking purposes. Whereas, others are going to exploit gas because it is cheaper than those. In this article, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion on the conclusion.
6.5
band
Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?
It is still debatable among people whether animals used in experiments should be outlawed, while others argue that experimentation on animals is important in order to achieve scientific breakthroughs. In this essay, I will elaborate on the reason why such an experiment should be forbidden along with a possible alternative.
7.5
band
Language teacher should concentrate only on giving positive feedback when students do good work rather than on criticizing their bad work. To what extent you agree or disagree?
Being a teacher is a job with major responsibilities. Many people think positive reinforcement is the best way to teach students a new language. Others believe that criticism is important to allow them to learn from their mistakes. My personal opinion lies somewhere in between.
6.5
band
Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packing. Discuss both views and give your opinions. Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
The issue of excessive packaging has sparked considerable debate. Some argue that manufacturers and supermarkets should take responsibility for reducing packaging, while others believe that consumers should avoid purchasing overly packaged goods. Both perspectives have merit and play crucial roles in addressing this environmental concern.

As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In many countries people use electric devices for daily house chores while some think it is an expensive energy source and we ought to use gas instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.?

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Language teacher should concentrate only on giving positive feedback when students do good work rather than on criticizing their bad work. To what extent you agree or disagree?