Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money other public services. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Presendaly

Suggestion

Presently

, in many countries,

art

is considered as an important matter, and is subsidized by the

government

.

However

, some put the value of

art

under question, citing authorities should stop

this

help and investigate other public services

instead

.

Nonetheless

, it seems to me,

arts

Suggestion

the arts

can significantly influence societies, and

therefore

, artists should be supported. All kinds of arts,

such

as painting, music, dance, theatre and cinema are able to express and convey the feeling of the artist and the society throughout time and space, which fact-based articles and books are unable to transfer. It can

also

function as powerful means of communication between different cultures and languages, as they have numerous common sensations to share.

For example

, all people in the world can understand and relate

with

Suggestion

to

music.

Finally

, it usually, stimulates the imagination and creativity capabilities of both composers and audience.

This

could result in success even in other aspects of life.

However

, critics insist even in case of accepting the values, supporting by the

government

may disrupt the artist's

independency

freedom from control or influence of another or others

independence

.

That is

to say, the

government

, probably, helps only some specific proponent productions, and other compositions would,

thus

, be deprived.

As a

result many

Accept comma addition

result, many

artists may change or censor their opinions and views to gain the

government

incentives.

This

may lead to weak and superficial

art

works unable to convey

true perception

Suggestion

a true perception

the true perception

. Examples can be seen in

medieval era

Suggestion

the medieval era

, which only religion-based arts were supported by the church, and arts based on other beliefs could not achieve any interest.

On the other hand

, supports point out, artists, usually, do not have another way of living, meaning without sponsorship they unable to survive, and

therefore

, many fine arts would never be made. They conclude it is the officials' responsibility to support

art

composers, so that they can focus entirely on producing high-quality works. To sum up, the society is benefited dramatically from

art

,

such

as registering and transferring profound feelings, sharing common sense through the world, and positive impacts on people's mind. I take the view that, all types or arts and artists should be subsidized by the

government

.

Nevertheless

, we should be aware not to interfere the

independency

freedom from control or influence of another or others

independence

of artists.