Public museums and art galleries are not necessary because nowadays people can see the historical objects and works of art in these places on the Internet. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by some that virtual visiting of museums and

art

galleries on the

internet

can be substituted with the usual one. I completely agree with

this

opinion and think a hectic lifestyle spontaneously leads to finding a new way to visit those places.

First

of all, the style of life nowadays has been doing some limitations on people's behaviours rather than types of entertainment and allocate appropriate

time

to visit museums and

art

galleries cannot situate in priorities.

For instance

, when people from all walks of life want to work in a long

time

to earn enough income corresponds with living costs, finding enough

time

for spending on

such

hobbies does not affordable

therefore

tackling a way to respond to

this

matter will be possible in virtual visiting through the

internet

. Another point to consider is that accessibility of some museums and

art

galleries because of cost and destination is considered a big challenge for visitors, which can be managed with new technology

such

as simulation of them on the

internet

.

For example

, In Iran, a big section of people have not the opportunity to travel Egyptian pyramids or Louver Museum,

therefore

, technologies of artificial intelligence and virtual reality can simulate reality to give a complete sensation of reality. To conclude, I strongly believe that simulation of Museums and

art

galleries, on the

internet

, is more beneficial than visiting those places because it saves

time

and money and

on the other hand

, these technologies discard the need for travelling to a far destination.