Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

There is an argument that prosperous countries ought to help developing nations to meet their basic need during natural tragedies. Naturally, I completely agree with

this

position due to the following reasons.

To begin

with, assisting communities in need are ethical, as the poor population of these regions is suffering with preventable problems,

therefore

, having resources to assist them, the wealthy part of the globe should act.

For instance

, many religions spread out the idea of helping others, and

this

affects the number of volunteers in organizations.

Additionally

, developed nations have played a critical role in climate change, since they are the main

responsibles

worthy of or requiring responsibility or trust; or held accountable

responsible

for the deforestation, air pollution, and water pollution,

as a result

, their assistance would be an

indenization

for the damage caused by them.

Furthermore

, humanitarian assistance may reduce immigration numbers, because a significant part of refugees

is related

Suggestion

are related

relate

to disasters of nature, which forces them to leave their homeland.

For example

, after the 2006 hurricane in the Phillipines, Japan received 20% more immigrants, affecting the governments social care.

Moreover

, helping poor governments during critical circumstance improves global development, thanks to the reduction of poverty among

poor citizens

Suggestion

the poor citizens

,

consequently

raising social and economic global statistics. To conclude, I do agree that developed governments should assist underserved populations with humanitarian help. Due to the fact that not only does it is an ethical norm, but

also

guarantees international development.