Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that public libraries are unnecessary, as their function can be carried out by digital

technology

. In my opinion, I disagree with

this

because there are several function libraries do that electronic

technology

cannot do, and they are more secure. There are numerous tasks that public libraries are used for that they would be

otherwise

impossible using digital

technology

.

Firstly

, libraries store several items that modern

technology

cannot store.

For example

, many artefacts and sculptures are stored physically in libraries, because it is impossible to store them electronically. If governments close public libraries,

then

many of these valuable items will be lost.

Moreover

, most public libraries host exhibitions and conferences. As many would agree that expecting

such

events to be carried out digitally is unrealistic.

Therefore

, public libraries carry out several tasks that cannot be done using digital

technology

.

Furthermore

, replacing libraries with digital

technology

could lead to the disappearance of historical books and novels.

This

is because

technology

is susceptible to failure, and if they got damaged, we might lose all information.

For example

, while many books can be found online, most of them have an original physical versions in public libraries, so that if we lose the one stored online, we have the main one in the library.

Therefore

, storing books in libraries

is

Suggestion

are

a safe way to ensure that they do not get lost. In conclusion, public libraries have an important role to play in securing valuable items and are arguably more secure than digital

technology

.

Thus

, I believe that they should be maintained.