It is more important for schoolchildren to learn local history than world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that the importance of the local or national

history

outweighs the importance of the

world

history

. They opine that there are no benefits of understanding and learning the

world

history

. I disagree with their points of view for some good reasons, as described below. On the one hand, I

second

the outlook that schoolchildren ought to familiarize themselves with the local

history

. At the onset, it offers them a sense of belonging and pride when they learn about their

history

. Most countries had gone through a bloodbath for their freedom. They will know about invaluable sacrifices that their ancestors made for the freedom,

Secondly

, which is more important, they will learn about the origin and core values of their motherland. By

this

way, they will be able to carry forward their customs to the

next

generation with a story to tell always.

On the other hand

, knowing about the

world

history

has its own distinctive merits. In

this

globalized

world

, interdependence of trade has made people travel the

world

. These young children surely reap benefits when they are grown up and mobile for any purpose. Armed with the broader prospective, they are able to integrate into the local culture of other countries.

This

bank of knowledge helps them to know about the past developments and the origins of people across the globe. In conclusion, I support the notion of learning the

history

of the nation and

world

for young children as it makes sense and serves the purpose.