, many countries had been
to develop the advances items to solve the lack of
food
in the
world
by the way why many people around the
world
still go hungry. In my opinion,
irefers to the speaker or writer
think "
captialisman economic system based on private ownership of capital
".
Under "the
world
order" by
in 1970 (the cold war) divided the
countrisa politically organized body of people under a single government
around the
world
in toexpresses motion to a point on, or within, something
3 groups, 1) the
first
world
like USA
UK
Japan like
, 2) the
second
word was like Soviet union and 3) the
third
word was a
devoplingrelating to societies in which capital needed to industrialize is in short supply
. I didn't think the
captialisman economic system based on private ownership of capital
is bad,
irefers to the speaker or writer
think it made many
such
as the lack of
food
in the poor countries.
According to the Economics, the
develpedbeing changed over time so as to be e.g. stronger or more complete or more useful
countries have
absolute
to take an
adventagethe quality of having a superior or more favorable position
the
resouseavailable source of wealth; a new or reserve supply that can be drawn upon when needed
in the
develpingrelating to societies in which capital needed to industrialize is in short supply
countries with the lowest wage, the hardest working and the dangerous places
hence
, the people who live in the
deveplingrelating to societies in which capital needed to industrialize is in short supply
countries has no
oppunitiesa possibility due to a favorable combination of circumstances
to
their status.
lowest wage they get vice versa the high price of their item
for example
1 dollar US per a day for 1 worker in the
develpedbeing changed over time so as to be e.g. stronger or more complete or more useful
countries, but 100 dollar US per the item product to be
selleddisposed of to a purchaser
, the cap is approximate 99
US goes to the owner who live in the developed countries.
The solve of
this
problem
, I think the
govermentthe organization that is the governing authority of a political unit
each
should
their citizen to have a basic rights,
food
, clear water and Education,
for example
. The highest price of
food
that
restrizereturn to its original or usable and functioning condition
the poor people to access the
food
, the government need to bare the barrier
picesa separate part of a whole
of
food
won't be high.
In the long team of solving
this
problem
, the government will give more Education fee
asThe objective case of we, the persons speaking
free for
civilanassociated with civil life or performed by persons who are not active members of the military
becausfor the reason that; on account of
I absolutely think Education comes with mobilisation the social status when the people has a high Education comes with a hire in a high working.
the
govermentthe organization that is the governing authority of a political unit
should bare the fee of
is not high as well.
people will be expenditure more. When the more expenditure the people have, the more money they
have to solve
this
problem
together, Not the duty of some countries, the
problem
will be eradicated from the wild.
fainally weAccept comma addition
Finally, we
Finally we
Fainally we
have to have a hope to solve it, Not despair yet.