Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organisations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is the responsibility of a
government
to finance and control scientific
research
, and private organizations should not be the one doing it. I completely agree with
this
school of thought because without financial stress the
research
team can
work
with complete focus, and the success of any
research
benefits the country’s economy and status.
Firstly
, if the
government
of a country will provide funds for the
research
work
, the organizations working on the trials will be stress-free and can maintain its focus solely on their
work
.
This
will result in a timely completed successful
research
without any hindrance that could have occurred because of the financial matters.
For example
, it was reported by The Clinical Trial Association that around 72% of the
government
supported
researches
Suggestion
research
complete successfully because the trial team have sufficient funds to
work
on their
research
without any waiting period which normally happens when supported by the private organizations.
Moreover
, the results of a successful
research
ultimately benefit the country’s status and economy all over the world.
That is
to say that if a
government
is going to receive the benefits of a successful trial,
then
it should be its responsibility to take care of the expenses needed to perform that
research
.
For instance
, it is reported by the World Medical Association that the US is the largest supplier of the cancer medications which are researched, made and marketed by the US
government
itself. In conclusion, any scientific
research
should be supported financially by the respective
government
because the
research
team can give their best to their
work
if there is no tension about the expense occurring
on
Suggestion
at
in
the trial, and at the end, a successful
research
increases the fame and economical status of the
government
itself.
Submitted by drmansidawesar on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Topic Vocabulary:
  • equitable access
  • public good
  • prioritize
  • environmental conservation
  • public health
  • bureaucratic inefficiencies
  • stifle innovation
  • profit motives
  • enhance efficiency
  • rapid advancements
  • combined approach
  • stable funding
  • ethical standards
What to do next:
Look at other essays: