It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while other problems are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Each species, no matter how small, have a role to play in the ecosystem. Loss of animals has detrimental effects on medical research and the development of treatment.

Moreover

, we should preserve

wildlife

for future generation to enjoy.

In addition

, Funding to save

wildlife

represents a small fraction of the amount of money spent by governments and does not significantly impact the amount of taxes that need to be collected. In

this

essay, the value of funding the

wildlife

will be discussed. Focusing on different problems is comparable in some respects. Like focus on

wildlife

, Health problems aim to develop the medical systems, in order to prepare them for their future lives. Both types of problems are

also

very similar in the way they will save future generations. So, If

government

solves one problem, it will

consequently

solve multiple problems at a time. As

wildlife

will be saved, Scientists can research about various diseases and find remedies for them.

As a result

, human lives can be saved by taking help of animal testing.

Thus

, saving animals will

also

help to save mankind. Despite these similarities, there are a number of marked differences in different problems

such

as funding of arts and

wildlife

protection is a totally different issue. While I still in the favour of protecting animals. More and More animals are becoming extinct, which lead to the possibility that our upcoming generations will be deprived of seeing animals that we grow seeing.

As a result

, it leads to the lack of imagination and diversity.

Moreover

, they deserve the equal rights to see them as they did not commit any crime. Sparrows,

for instance

, do no longer exist due to man's hunting activities. A key consideration for any

government

is the extent to which it should fund the

wildlife

. Almost, always, the

wildlife

represents a very small proportion of the

government

funding, which is primarily focused on other areas.

Therefore

, modest funding for the

wildlife

has little impact on taxpayers. In summary,

Wildlife

provides entertainment and

also

solutions to many health problems and is worthy of funding, particularly as it usually does not represent a significant proportion of

government

funding.