It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while other problems are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Each species, no matter how small, have a role to play in the ecosystem. Loss of animals has detrimental effects on medical research and the development of treatment.
Moreover
, we should preserve
wildlife
for future generation to enjoy.
In addition
, Funding to save
wildlife
represents a small fraction of the amount of money spent by governments and does not significantly impact the amount of taxes that need to be collected. In
this
essay, the value of funding the
wildlife
will be discussed. Focusing on different problems is comparable in some respects. Like focus on
wildlife
, Health problems aim to develop the medical systems, in order to prepare them for their future lives. Both types of problems are
also
very similar in the way they will save future generations. So, If
government
solves one problem, it will
consequently
solve multiple problems at a time. As
wildlife
will be saved, Scientists can research about various diseases and find remedies for them.
As a result
, human lives can be saved by taking help of animal testing.
Thus
, saving animals will
also
help to save mankind. Despite these similarities, there are a number of marked differences in different problems
such
as funding of arts and
wildlife
protection is a totally different issue. While I still in the favour of protecting animals. More and More animals are becoming extinct, which lead to the possibility that our upcoming generations will be deprived of seeing animals that we grow seeing.
As a result
, it leads to the lack of imagination and diversity.
Moreover
, they deserve the equal rights to see them as they did not commit any crime. Sparrows,
for instance
, do no longer exist due to man's hunting activities. A key consideration for any
government
is the extent to which it should fund the
wildlife
. Almost, always, the
wildlife
represents a very small proportion of the
government
funding, which is primarily focused on other areas.
Therefore
, modest funding for the
wildlife
has little impact on taxpayers. In summary,
Wildlife
provides entertainment and
also
solutions to many health problems and is worthy of funding, particularly as it usually does not represent a significant proportion of
government
funding.
Submitted by miss.nehawadhwa on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Wildlife conservation
  • Biodiversity
  • Ecosystem
  • Human welfare
  • Poverty alleviation
  • Resource allocation
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
  • Ecotourism
  • Sustainable development
  • Preservation
  • Endangered species
  • Habitat destruction
  • Climate change
  • Environmental stewardship
What to do next:
Look at other essays: