In the 70s, relationship
research
in psychology focused on the study of emotional bonds between people. Researchers reduced the role of children's
friendship
to the question of what makes them feel attracted to each other? Understanding the phenomenon of
friendship
in
more complex contextSuggestion
more complex contexts
a more complex context
of psychology was limited. In 1975, Brian Bigelow and John La
Gaipa
researched changes in the way children perceive and define
on their age and stage of development.
This
essay
will evaluate the usefulness of those findings and their
further
influence
shaping the understanding of children's friendships.
Initially
, Bigelow and La
Gaipa
's intention was to explore the differences in children's expectations towards their best friends at different stages of development. Researchers were interested in exploring changes in the perception of friendships that occur as the children grow up. Equally, their innovative
research
has opened a new chapter in understanding child
friendship
- an issue that has been unnoticed by psychology up to
this
point. To explore how children understand
friendship
, Bigelow and La
Gaipa
asked them to write an
essay
, describing the relationship with the same-sex best friend. Their task was to indicate the differences in expectations towards best friend and other colleagues.
However
, researchers did not consider
friendship
between children of opposite sexes, which could have an impact on the results of their
research
.
To conduct
research
, Bigelow and La
Gaipa
collected 480 essays written by different-sex children aged 6 to 14 years. They came from lower-middle-class and upper-working-class families. Eight different schools based in Windsor, Ontario, Canada joined the study. 30 boys and 30 girls were appointed from each of them to take part. A large sample group was undoubtedly an asset.
However
, the
method
of selecting participants for the studies could result in a sampling error.
Additionally
, their
research
has devalued the influence of culture. Gonzalez et al conducted a study based on the
method
used by Bigelow and La
Gaipa
in Cuba and Canada. The result showed
also
emphasized significant differences in
understanding Accept comma addition
understanding, friendship
friendship
between children from collectivist and individualistic cultures.
Before Bigelow and La
Gaipa
began the studies, they created a list of different characteristics that children could want to include when describing their best friend. Researchers divided the list into 21 categories and
then
used content analysis in each
essay
.
Furthermore
, they could quickly analyse samples of 480 essays by subordinating characteristics to categories already defined and applying frequency count. An additional advantage of the
method
used was the possibility of comparing differences in
understanding Accept comma addition
understanding, friendship
friendship
between children of different ages or opposite sexes.
However
, its limitation subordinated the characteristics of
friendship
to predetermined coding.
Such
a solution excluded the inclusion of traits indicated in the
essay
by children if their reasoning did not fit into categories created by the researchers. In view of the above, I suspect that the
method
could have contributed to affecting
research
findings by confirmatory bias.
Furthermore
, generalisation through the transformation of qualitative into quantitative data caused the loss in describing individual and personal dimensions on the studied children.