Many parents (mostly women) decide to stay home and take care of the family members instead of going out for work. Some people suggest that they should be paid by the government for doing that. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.

The past decades have seen there was increasing awareness of

woman's right

Suggestion

woman's rights

;

thus

, some maintained that

housewife

Suggestion

a housewife

should be paid by the

government

for their job,

such

as taking care of the family.

This

essay,

however

, will argue that considering

houseparents

as a position is not appropriate, and my reasons are twofold. Admittedly, especially

womenists

a classical scholar or student of the liberal arts

humanists

can argue that they

scrifice

endure the loss of

sacrifice

sacrificed

opportunities of employment in order to take care of the family members;

additionally

, the reason why the fertility rate remains low is a lake of

government

's help,

laking

inadequate in amount or degree

lacking

income resources contributing to a lower lives

stander

.

Nevertheless

, it is groundless to argue that a lower fertility and a lower lives

stander

can be attributed

laking

Suggestion

to lack

lacking

looking

leaking

government

's funding. One

undisputable

not open to question; obviously true

indisputable

reason is that the fertility rate is not as low as those people say in some countries, though the

contries

a politically organized body of people under a single government

countries

centuries

controls

did not pay for them. One obvious example is that in China rural most people's income

relys

have confidence or faith in

relies

rely

on self-reliance,

such

as farming or hunting;

therefore

, the number of people is the factor affecting their income resource. More people means that more food and a higher

lives

Suggestion

life

stander

, but some may argue

that the example only

Suggestion

that the only example

the only example that

exists in rural villages.

Therefore

, another reason why

government

should not pay for them is that in plenty of counties there have been a sufficient subsides to assist a family having babies and living in cities.

Thus

, paying should be out of

question

Suggestion

the question

.

Although

, the subsides is not enough to

surpport

give moral or psychological support, aid, or courage to

support

a

whold

including all components without exception; being one unit or constituting the full amount or extent or duration; complete

whole

family, but at least it can remain a certain

lives

Suggestion

life

stander

in cities. In conclusion, subsides and self-reliance are my main

reasons beliving

Accept comma addition

reasons, believing

reasons believing

that governments should not pay for them.