Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

In

this

present-day world of technological advancement and globalization, travelling long distances away from home for work or for studies have become a norm, which results in an extensive use of either roads or railways.

Therfore

Suggestion

Therefore

, the

government

has to spend

money

on developing as well as sustaining these means of commute, but the question remains, whether the

government

should direct more

money

towards railways or roads. In my honest opinion, both railways and roads have their own pros and cons and I believe that the

government

should invariably spend equal proportions of

money

for both. On one hand, we have railways

that

is

Suggestion

are

undoubtedly a cheap and

ecofriendly

means of communication that makes sure the passengers reach their destination without fail

throughhout

all the way through

throughout

the year in any weather condition.

However

, trains are not usually safe if one is not very

vigiliant

carefully observant or attentive; on the lookout for possible danger

vigilant

vigilante

of his

surrounding

the environmental condition

surroundings

as

picpocketing

the possibility of future success

prospecting

in a crowded train is not unheard of.

Also

, not all trains run on schedule and on that context, some trains are usually

late which

Accept comma addition

late, which

can cause severe

incoviniences

an inconvenient discomfort

inconveniences

inconvenience

for students and workers who are supposed to reach their workplace on time.

For instance

, the central railways carry thousands of people everyday back and forth from CST to Karjat since early in the

morninvg

the time period between dawn and noon

morning

till late at night, but only a few of these trains are on time and some of these trains are often more than twenty minutes late.

Thus

, it makes sense for

govenment

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

government

to direct a decent

amout

a quantity of money

amount

of

money

towards railways to increase the frequency of trains and build more tracks, which can result in a

profficient

having or showing knowledge and skill and aptitude

proficient

crowd control and time management, making

travelling

Suggestion

travel

more

convinient

suited to your comfort or purpose or needs

convenient

as well as safe for the passengers.

On the other hand

, private vehicles and cabs have an upper hand when it comes to

convinience

the state of being suitable or opportune

convenience

conveniences

and comfort of travelling.

Nevertheless

, over-crowding of vehicles on roads can lead to increased release of fumes and gasses that result in pollution and global-warming, which in

unision

corresponding exactly

unison

with broken roads, provides a bumpy ride to the traveller.

For example

, the roads in Bombay are not only heavily

cowded

overfilled or compacted or concentrated

crowded

coded

clouded

and the traffic jam may end up requiring upto half an hour to clear up, but

also

have serious pothole issues which can damage the vehicle and result in a rough ride.

Therfore

Suggestion

Therefore

, it makes sense for

government

to spend a

similiar

marked by correspondence or resemblance

similar

amout

a quantity of money

amount

of

money

in repairing and maintaining roads as well as to construct more roadways and bridges with a broad corridor to efficiently manage the traffic and

consequently

, pollution. Taken together, I would like to conclude by saying that the

government

should carefully think and plan out a

developemen

act of improving by expanding or enlarging or refining

development

developments

t and sustainable upgrade for both railways and roads to avoid the overwhelming consequences of untreated and

unmanage

d conditions, while savouring the fruits of either means of communication