Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a real difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

More than any time in the history, environmental condition is depleting at an ever higher rate. Most people support that individuals are capable of a minuscule contribution to save the natural
ecosystem
, and only governing authorities and massive corporation units can produce an impactful change. I totally agree with
this
view as they can not only discourage the vehicle
usage
and
rubbish
generation. To embark with, the cogent reason why federal authorities are capable of producing a significant control on the natural
ecosystem
is that they can discourage the fossil based motor vehicle
usage
. Since governing bodies possess more resources in the form of money - which can be utilized to employ manpower and the state of art machineries - they can easily
setup
Suggestion
set up
a well-connected public transportation system in the cities so that people can leverage the benefits of trains and buses for their daily commute.
As a result
,
this
adaptation to public transport will slant down vehicle, which runs on fossil fuels,
usage
, leading to
safe-guard
make safe
safeguard
the natural
ecosystem
.
For example
, a recent survey depicted that 40% people have stopped driving to the office since the launch of Metro train in Mumbai.
Thus
, if a large impact is required in the form of reducing vehicles from the road,
then
the federal system carries more resources to
setup
Suggestion
set up
public transportation.
Furthermore
, another reason why large organization can make a sizeable contribution to secure the environmental health is that they can decrease the amount of
rubbish
being generated in the country. Whenever some large companies
such
as Railways opt to impose no
plastic
usage
policy, the production of
rubbish
by the people could be decreased to a large extent. To exemplify, as per a recent survey published by the Indian Railways, there has been a 60% less
plastic
rubbish
produced in year 2018-19 after announcing no
plastic
usage
in trains.
Thus
, since large co-operations are so widely spread across the country, they can contribute massively to save the
ecosystem
just by inculcating a few changes. To conclude, some people support that the government and large organizations can contribute more when it comes to securing the planet's
ecosystem
rather than any individual. I totally agree with
this
viewpoint as they can reduce the number of vehicles which burn fossil fuel by implementing public transportation, and slash the
rubbish
by simply applying eco-friendly practices
such
as no
plastic
policy.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainable practices
  • renewable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • waste reduction
  • conservation
  • ecosystem
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • responsibility
  • leadership
  • legislation
  • investment
  • collaboration
  • systemic change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: