Governments around the world are now investing a great deal in therapy for illnesses and diseases.
However
, some people believe that it is better to solve the problem at source by spending more on
health
eductionthe activities of educating or instructing; activities that impart knowledge or skill
and prevention. I myself disagree with
this
opinion.
fundamental
funtions(mathematics) a mathematical relation such that each element of a given set (the domain of the function) is associated with an element of another set (the range of the function)
of the government and civilians' responsibility will shed light on my point of view.
Firstly
, governments, of course, should be responsible for
health
care system. In reality, there are many examples worldwide that huge public investment in building modern hospitals and equipping cutting-edge machines in diagnosing and treating illnesses. Only by spending on
such
-cost innovation, can the government provide strong enough treatment for fatal diseases like heart stroke, cancer,...
are now increasingly common.
Thus
,
this
makes clear that spending a great amount of money on taking care of the
health
of the society is one of the government's obligations.
Secondly
, I believe that we, as civilians, play the most significant part in educating ourselves and preventing
ourselvesThe objective case of we, the persons speaking
from absolutely avoidable diseases. I would like to cite some information that
irefers to the speaker or writer
have learned from Ted talks show on
that despite governmental strategies
health
education and high taxation in cigarette industry the main reasons behind
illnesses
such
as lung cancer, diabetes, heart stroke are our physical inactivity, unhealthy diets and smoking habit. These behaviours which are definitely dependant on ourselves are
erading(geology) the mechanical process of wearing or grinding something down (as by particles washing over it)
our
health
and leading us to the hospital in the future.
That is
to say, the
responsibilySuggestion
responsibility
responsible
for prevention and
health
promotion actually falls on our hand rather than governments.
In summary, budget distribution for treating illnesses and diseases is an inherent part of governmental operation and citizens are at the core in protecting themselves.
Therefore
,
public spending on medical service is compulsory and reasonable. In the future, I firmly believe that governments worldwide are likely to remain
this
bigger spending because illnesses and diseases may become more serious and widespread.