It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

The idea of travel to remote areas
such
as South pole is now possible due to the development of technology. While I accept that
this
new evolution may sometimes have a positive effect on scientists and tourists, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact. On the one hand, there are some minor advantages caused by travel to some remote natural environment.
Firstly
, scientists might have more opportunities to collect samples and observe the environment in order to achieve their research goals. Another benefit of
this
trend is that tourists in those remote places can provide more job opportunities to local people.
Consequently
,
this
helps rural communities earn more profits, which improves their living standards.
In addition
, by voyaging to those remarkable locations, travellers have a chance to visit the most spectacular landscapes on earth.
However
, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Trips to remote regions involved a lot of risks because we do not know much about the area.
Secondly
, tourism development could put pressure on natural resources.
For example
, by building tourism facilities
such
as accommodation, restaurant and road infrastructures could lead to land degradation, soil and sand erosion and the loss of wildlife habitats.
Furthermore
, some of these locations already encountered the negative effects of activities related to tourism. Everest mountain,
for instance
, has been suffering by over climbers.
As a result
, environmental pollution had been occurring according to littering and solid waste. In conclusion, even though exploring uncommon places are interesting and beneficial, it seems to me that the potential dangers of travel to unknown destinations are more significant than the possible benefits.
Submitted by gandhi.nikita20 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: