Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In order to visit cultural and ancient places, tourists ought to be charged more than local people. I totally disagree with

this

argument as charging international visitors more is not a wise decision to be made for numerous reasons. Tourists are not always in possession of large sums of money. Many foreigners decide to visit other countries due to their interest in the history and the traditions of that place, yet on a limited budget. Increasing the fees for those visitors might dissuade them from travelling due to their inability to afford the fees.

In other words

,

this

might lead to a noticeable decline in tourism.

For example

, foreign visitors already pay enough money for accommodation, food, and buying gifts from countries they visit,

thus

, it is unnecessary to increase their entrance fees to historical locations.

Furthermore

, the value of spreading the culture and the history of a nation is far more valuable than gaining extra money from tourists. The possibility of the decline in tourism

that is

caused by the increased fees would reduce the spread of one’s culture and history to other parts of the world.

For instance

,

instead

of thousands of people visiting a specific

country

for its culture and traditions and learning about it, only wealthy tourists would be able to afford travelling to it.

This

leads to reduced cultural influence, which would make a

country

unknown for the majority of people worldwide. To conclude,

although

charging international visitors more may seem beneficial to the economy of a

country

to some degree, the drawbacks overshadow the benefits. The decline in tourism and the reduction of cultural impact are possible consequences of

such

a decision, which would adversely affect the popularity of a

country

.