Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human populations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some individuals believe that the human

population

can be more supported by the large amount of time and money which has been

instead

allocated to preserve the wildlife. Personally, I am of the notion that the protection of wild animals can provide the inhabitants of undeveloped regions with some job opportunities and

food

resources, while the

further

growth of human

population

can worsen the environment’s status and access to initial human requirements. The development of industries and cities has limited the habitats of most of wild animals to only some intact forests and plains. The majority of these creatures have been exposed to extinction;

therefore

, without the support of international organizations, these valuable species will definitely disappear from the Earth in the near future.

Such

supportive measures include funded, long-term, scientific projects aimed to preserve the wildlife. One of the most important purposes of

such

programs is to preserve some of wild animals which have been a component of the

food

chain and been used as a rich source of

food

.

For example

, for the inhabitants of a faraway island in which the land erosion has impeded the farming, fishing can be the alternative choice to achieve the required

food

.

Therefore

, in order to protect the edible fishes, construction of new artificial habitats which promote their hatching guarantees the survival of

such

species. What is obvious is that these time-consuming projects need

considerable amount

Suggestion

a considerable amount

of financial supports. The other advantage of protections of wild animals can be observed in the number of job opportunities, most of which

are created

Suggestion

is created

in deprived,

unindustrialized

made industrial; converted to industrialism

industrialized

countries with high rates of unemployment.

For instance

, thousands of tourists travel to Africa to visit the intact habitats of some rare species – lions, elephants, and rhinos – and enjoy watching them hunting and grazing

in

Suggestion

on

plains

Suggestion

the plains

. As the result, indigenous people have the chance of making a living through leading or accommodating these tourists.

Moreover

, local laboratories which have been set up to perform scientific investigations on protection of rare animals employ some interested indigenous researchers through

funded

Suggestion

funding

projects, creating a source of income for them. On the opposite side, some people claim that it is more beneficial to spend

such

amount of money and time on promotion of the human

population

― through supplying

food

, water, and hygiene. While a considerable percentage of the world’s

population

struggle with significant

issues including

Accept comma addition

issues, including

water and

food

shortages in populated regions, it is obvious that the

further

population

growth deteriorates these issues because of limited present resources.

Additionally

, any effort to increase the human

population

has direct influences on the environment; more forests should be cut down to develop more farms or construct new residential areas, with higher rates of greenhouse gases being emitted. To recap, redirecting the time and money spent on protection of wildlife to human needs not only endangers some of

food

resources and jobs in less developed regions, but

also

results in excessive growth of

population

, which leads to difficulties in providing their basic requirements and combating environment challenges.