Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The question of how much

information

relevant to various areas of scientific and academic research should be shared is becoming more and more important as the pace of technological innovation quickens and the internet allows for instant collaboration. In my opinion,

information

is a valuable, potentially dangerous asset and should only be shared freely

in particular

circumstances. Advocates of freely sharing

information

rightly argue that collaboration leads to faster results.

This

applies to scientists, who can help each by offering their individual research results, businesses, which can work together as long as they are not competitors on advertising or product development, as well as academics, who need fresh perspectives to push their work to higher plateaus. Take

for example

the potential for sharing

information

in the business

world

. Google has built their successful advertising business by working together with various companies and sharing

information

. Google collects a variety of statistics related to

users including

Accept comma addition

users, including

their location and interests.

This

information

is shared with advertisers who can

then

better target ads for users. It allows the consumer to see more relevant products and services and the companies advertising to target their audience more efficiently. While there are decided advantages like the one mentioned above,

information

is still a valuable asset that individuals and companies should safeguard. In a perfect

world

, we might expect people to openly share everything they

know but

Accept comma addition

know, but

the social and economic constructions of our actual

world

make

this

a naive proposition. One interesting example of

this

is from a recent news article about Elon Musk where he explained why his rocket company SpaceX does not apply for patents on any new technology. He reasoned that his main competitors are governments, not private companies. If his company discloses its innovations

then

domestic and foreign governments can take advantage of the shared technology and potentially disrupt his business.

This

is just one example of how sharing can prove damaging in a capitalist society. In conclusion, though sharing might be a valid standpoint in a perfect

world

, it is not feasible under current global conditions.

Instead

of looking to increase sharing, governments should do more to support innovative companies and researchers.

This

will have a larger overall impact.