One of the most prominent exploration about children’s understanding of
was conducted by Brian Bigelow and John La
in the 1970’s.
is seen differently in
the younger ones, as they grow older children becomes more complex as well as the meaning of
.
essay will
outline Bigelow and La
(1975)
on understanding children’s
.
, it will outline the approach of their
looking at the
method they used.
, it will attempt to evaluate the usefulness of their work and look as well as providing an overview on the influence of culture to
children’s relationshipSuggestion
the children’s relationship
of
.
, it will provide a short summary of the points made and it will attempt to conclude the usefulness of the
.
Understanding
young people is more complex than just defining what the concept means. As they mature, the qualities on a search for a friend becomes more profound. At that time it was an under-
issue in Psychology. Bigelow and La
(1975) used an unconventional
approach to other previous
studies,
of doing observations or administering questionnaires they collected their data in written form.
, the focus of Bigelow and La
(1975)
was to understand children’s emotional relationship and what attracts them from one another (Brownlow, C., 2012). In order to understand the idea, the two researchers looked at the distinction of
on several stages of child development. They collected a large sample of 480 written essays from sixty children (30 girls and 30 boys) between six and fourteen years from upper-working class and lower-middle class homes in Windsor, Ontario, Canada (Brownlow, C., 2012,
. 242). The
of doing it
way is because children, especially the young ones are able to express themselves better in
form than expressing themselves out loud.
Before they started their investigation, they came up with a list of twenty-one
expectations. The gathered data was qualitative in nature. In order to assess the details, they used Content Analysis which was used to examine written, audio, visual materials that
and counts the significant information that was useful in answering a query (Brownlow, 2012,
.243).
was done to count the
of each expectation which was
referred to as frequency count.
, the researchers were able to transform the qualitative data into quantitative data through frequency counts (Brownlow, 2012,
. 245). Interestingly, Bigelow and La
(1975) found some important differences in the children’s expectations of
. Sixteen out of the original twenty-one expectations were more persistent based on the older children’s description
to the younger ones (Brownlow, 2012,
. 243).
indicates that the children’s expectations of a best friend
more sophisticated as they mature.
, they were able to compare the written essays to their list and used frequency counts to look for patterns in their data that would be useful in understanding about the changing nature of
in children. Not only that, they were
able to compare the samples in order to see the differences between boys and girls as well as younger and older children. They found that in general,
of gender the difference is insignificant.
an organised play boys tend to have more expectations than girls (Brownlow, 2012,
.244).
Philip Erwin (1988) noted that as children mature the
of
changes. He
argued that peers act as a powerful source of support for them cited in (Brownlow, 2012, pp. 240-241) while younger children mostly rely on parents for support and guidance,
is true on most occasions as parents are their
contact for help and comfort. Bigelow and La
(1975) proposed a three-
model of development of
expectations. The
looks at the significance of shared activities
as sports (for boys), the possibility of interacting with each other,
as hanging out at the park or each other’s houses, so geographically closeness is very important. An example of
can be found on the teenagers discussion on
, one of the teenagers said that he wouldn’t necessarily
with the people he doesn’t see very often so he doesn’t consider them as best mates (The Open University, 2019). The
focuses on the transition of individual needs
as sharing confidential information about themselves, loyalty and commitment to each other. At
point they were able to make judgement on the level of
they will have. The
emphasizes the
of commonness in attitudes, values and interests and the possibility of starting an intimate relationship as well as confiding. Children at
have a very specific criteria in acknowledging a best friend. Listening to the teenagers discussion online, teenager 1 said that he wouldn’t necessarily confide in someone who he doesn’t know well enough like someone at college (The Open University, 2019). Obviously, the level of
is different at
point, the best mates are the ones he can confide in and
more often as opposed to the ones that just say hi every now and
. Bigelow and La
’s (1975)
helped gain an insight on understanding what the meaning of
for children really means.
, it supplied evidence regarding the children’s
and how it becomes more complex as they grow older.
Their decision to transform data from qualitative to quantitative data raised some questions
as preservation of the children’s accounts and the possibility of doing it differently without losing more details.
, It is important to remember that they came up with predetermined
expectations that were later used for comparison rather than individualised features.
, they wanted to make generalisations about children’s
and develop a model that could be used in the wider population. It is
possible that there were some expectations that they might have missed
as the influence of culture in children’s expectations of
. One advantage of using
technique is that it illustrates how to transform a large sample of qualitative data to quantitative data using content analysis.
In conclusion, the work of Bigelow and La
(1975) has shown
in understanding the changing nature of
on children through the three-
model of development in
expectations they develop using content analysis. Their contribution to
methods has been very useful and influential because it introduced the concept to the
children’s relationships. Their
of children raised some questions on accuracy and reliability,
, with the evidence they provided they were able to prove that the purpose of
method was to make generalisations
it can be used in a wider population.