Some critics believe that valuable art should require much training nd time to master. Others, however, argue that art is independent of such factors and the value depends entirely on the perspective of the observer. Which opinion do you agree with and why?

There many arguments between value of
art
because
art
itself has a various style. Someone believes that the artist should have a
lot
practice time to do before doing their
art
, others aesthetic of
art
may depend on an aspect of the viewer. Form my opinion, I think there are a
lot
of faith of beauty,
therefore
it could depend on each observer why like that
work
It is clear that some types of works are required more time to practice. As a one of the groups who have attained watercolour class. It is very hard to control water and must to have a
lot
of time to practice. In one particular example, Michelangelo, who is a famous artist in the world. When we look at his
work
, it can explain that his arts have to use a
lot
of diligence,
such
as, painting wall and ceiling in a catholic church in the Vatican. But it does not mean everyone must like his
work
.
On the other hand
, new modern artists have more different from classic artists. They have more creativity and want to show their emotions or feelings to do their
work
.
For example
, Jackson Pollock, who is the famous in abstract
art
photographs or other visual representations in a printed publication
artwork
work
. His
work
has a
lot
of argument because its similar children’s artwork, especially when compared with Michelangelo’ works. Yet, others think his
art
has more feeling than former.
Thus
, aesthetic of
art
may depend on personal taste which have numerous ideas. In conclusion, I believe that
art
is relevant to the message of each artist or purpose.
art
the products of human creativity; works of art collectively
Art
is very independent and we should not use own rule to determine the other.
Submitted by tongmek158 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: