It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books". Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?

It is often said that books do not contain the whole of the knowledge that one learns in his lifetime. In my opinion, both sources are important to gain intelligence which usually depends on the age of the person. Books plays the most important role of attaining the learning in the initial stages of life. The child’s brain is usually sculpted to retain information from the graphics and the print material. Young children gather proficiency from the books and

then

in their adulthood, they apply, experiment and

then

learn from the experience.

For instance

, my four-year-old has a habit of reading alphabet books, and to my surprise, he learnt writing of the alphabets himself which we tried to teach him since a long time. Experience

also play

Suggestion

also plays

has also played

a role to uplift one’s education,

however

the person must be of that age in which implementation can be done. Adolescents or adults usually apply their theory to their chores and if that fails fulfil the purpose,

then

, they get the teaching of life not to repeat the same.

For example

, a 12-year-old boy in my vicinity was learning how to paddle, cycle, each time he paddles the chain releases. After much inspection, he got to know that he didn't lock it properly. In conclusion, an individual learns from experience by implementing from what they have learnt in young age by reading books.

Hence

, I believe that depending on the maturity of the person, one can get knowledge from books or from their experience in their life.