Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Developed countries are expected to take in more asylum seekers and provide them with

shelter

Suggestion

Shelter

and means to live on.

However

Linking Words

, do countries gain benefits from accepting refugees? In

this

Linking Words

essay I will argue that accepting foreigners who seek better life conditions can be risky for the

society

Suggestion

A society

Society

that is

Linking Words

going to shelter them as well as from the perspective of consuming the resources that are already scarce in number. Accepting refugees from less developed countries may pose a number of risks for the state planning to open its doors and let them in. An example of

such

Linking Words

a risk could be the undermining of the security of the society and endangering the values that have identified the nation for centuries. Letting these people in would mean indirectly accepting their cultural background

and

Suggestion

And

values which in the course of time may decay the societal whole of the country. Another important reason why accepting refugees may be dangerous for a nation is the inevitable increase in the consumption of the resources. Today, many states speak about the scarcity of the natural resources and highlight the importance of reducing their use.

Thus

Linking Words

, the more refugees a country is willing to accept, the more its population will grow, which will

subsequently

Linking Words

lead to a higher consumption of resources and may imperil the existence of future generations. So while leading states are generally expected to provide housing and food to refugees from less developed countries, doing so may undoubtedly be risky in terms of maintaining the societal structure and values as well as controlling and limiting the way in which its resources will be consumed by the

inevitably

Suggestion

inevitable

growing number of the population.