1. Overview and Background:
Ard
Al-
Futtaim
For General Trading
Company
Ltd.
Ard
Al-
Futtaim
) was established on May 30th, 2012 in Baghdad – Iraq. The entity has ceased the operations and the
company
has an
intercompany
loan
balance
its
balance
sheet as payable to the parent
company
.
Ard
Al
Futtaim
is not in a position to repay the
loan
balance
due to it does not have adequate
cash
and is making losses. The
loan
was given by
Ard
Al
Futtaim
’s shareholder ‘Select Auto’ which holds 100% shares in
Ard
Al
Futtaim
.
The extract of the 2018 financial statements as reflecting the below:
Description Amount (In IQD) Extract Of
Accumulated Losses 5,798,662,980
Balance
Sheet
Account
code 22
Short Term Loans 5,318,545,830
Balance
Sheet
Account
code 242
2. Discussion
Due to the landscape is complicated and not very easy in Iraq, the options for the
intercompany
loan
waiving should be discussed and decide for the pre-preparation of the liquidation stage. The
loan
offset options had been summarized under three options.
2.1. Netting of the previous
losses against to
intercompany
payable
/
loan
From the audit
standpoint
(accounting or presentation of financial
statement
), the
transaction
itself easy in terms of accounting adjustment in two
balance
sheet accounts.
However
, in the meantime, there is some
kind
of documentation to be put in place, if
this
transaction
is questioned,
in other words
, it should able to
kind
of support. As per Deloitte
practice
and
experience
in another
company
which located in Kurdistan Region
- The shareholder meeting is needed where the branch manager as well should be involved,
-
This
meeting minutes should be attested by the
company
register in Iraq
From the
tax
legislation
standpoint
, there should be no
tax
payable
the
transaction
doesn’t have any P&L
impact
.
This
kind
of
transaction
doesn’t occur very often as per the Iraqi
Tax
Legislation, but as
experience
in Iraq Kurdistan Region, it’s possible to execute without any
tax
burden.
However
, the
Ard
Al
Futtaim
in the Federal Iraq region, both authorities have the same
approach
with slight changes, but it indicates that
this
option
can apply in the same
approach
.
2.2. Capitalization of the
intercompany
payable
/
loan
The Capital Increase scenario can be challenging, due to
this
option
has not been tested in Iraq as per Deloitte
experience
.
On the other hand
,
this
process should be very much administered by the lawyer and legal teams. There may be some certain conditions;
-
capital increase may require to prove that sufficient
cash
balance
need to keep in the
bank
account
-
kind
of a capital increase (without injecting the
cash
for capital increase), it cannot be ensured whether can be implemented in Iraqi
practice
or not,
- From the accounting and legal
standpoint
,
this
option
may be challenging
Since
Ard
Al
Futtaim
does not have
this
cash
balance
in the
bank
account
,
this
option
may be considered in the future. To pursue
this
option
in the future,
this
option
is highly required
cash
transfer through the
bank
account
to prove
/
show it as a
balance
in the
bank
account
could be a deal-breaker.
2.3. Waiver to
intercompany
payable
/
loan
balance
From the audit
standpoint
(accounting or presentation of financial
statement
), the
transaction
may not require many formalities and the easiest
option
from
this
view.
From the
tax
point of view,
such
a
transaction
routed through the
income
statement
may trigger the
tax
implication.
This
option
can be seen as a
benefit favorAccept comma addition
benefit, favour
benefit favour
the parent
company
the
Tax
Authority
and it should be recognized as taxable revenue. In
practice
, the
tax
authority
has the deemed profit
approach
which treats 20% of the revenue generated from the main activities and 100% of the other
income
the corporate
tax
base.
According to the deemed profit
approach
, the waiver of the
loan
can be seen as one of the
transaction
, it may not be correlated with the main activities of the
company
by the
tax
authority
.
In
this
case, the
transaction
amount will be treated as 100%
revenue. So,
this
option
carries the highest financial burden potential in terms of
tax
legislation varying 3% (20% x 15%) to 15%.
Waiving the
loan
is the least
favoritesomething regarded with special favor or liking
because it has the P&L
impact
and it may trigger the
tax
impact
.
3. Conclusion & Recommendation
The options had been discussed, accounting & audit, corporate
tax
, and legal
standpoint
. In the light of the aforementioned discussions, it’s agreed to focus the energy and effort on the
first
option
.
Tax
Point of view, since
this
transaction
has not an
income
statement
impact
, we do not anticipate any
income
or
tax
to be raised from
this
transaction
.
Since the advance assessment has not been implemented in Iraq Legislation, the only possibility is the submission of the
tax
the return and financial
statement
and leave it to the
tax
authority
to provide its own feedback on the
tax
liability.
As per Deloitte’s
experience
in the
practice
, the
tax
inspectors very likely to focus on
income
statement
items rather than
balance
sheet items, since usually, they can trigger more
taxability
. Due to the main concentration on the
income
statement
, relatively
option
one (netting of the previous
losses against the
intercompany
loan
) has the least risk for additional financial &
tax
burden and it carries
risk of
tax
authority
being aware of
this
transaction
.