The best way to solve the worlds environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Environmentalists Hold varying opinions on how to approach the ever deteriorating ecosystem

problem

. Some consider raising the rate of gas is the most efficient way to remedy

this

environmental catastrophe. I,

however

, disagree that raising

fuel

cost on a global scale would help in alleviating the

problem

and

this

essay addresses The reasons behind my position. One reason to support my opinion is that by raising the price of

fuel

, products that depend on any kind of shipping either boy air, land or sea will witness is skyrocketing increase in prices

also

. Unfortunately, the cons would outweigh the pros if

this

happens, and economy will suffer deeply and many people won’t be able to afford basic life necessities.

Such

as electricity, using public transportation and many essential commodities.

Furthermore

, economy Will witness a downfall in many domains.

Moreover

,

this

in turn will repulse people from even considering a positive attitude toward the environmental

problem

. Another significant reason in favour of my argument is that researchers found that the fundamental reason behind the exacerbation of the environmental condition predominately due to industrial waste and exhausted toxic fumes from factories.

Thus

the effort exerted in raising the

fuel

rate is somehow futile.

Therefore

, any negative alteration made on the price of petroleum derivatives won't be met with Appreciation from the masses. To sum up, raising the

fuel

price might bring about some trivial benefits like raising peoples fitness, decreasing the reliance on

fuel

powered Vehicles and slight reduction of CO2 emissions, but it won’t be a long-term viable solution for the

problem

at hand.