Too much money is spent on repairing old buildings, instead that money should be spent on knocking down old buildings and building new ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often alleged that the government
is allocating
a huge amount budget on renovating ancient buildings
that sum should be spent on demolishing old constructions and building new ones. I am inclined to believe that
argument is not exactly true.
, funds should be used wisely. There is a wide array of reasons that account for the reconstructed
building but
Accept comma addition
building, but
the prime one is to conserve the historical value of that construction.
For example
, the Temple of Literature in Hanoi, which was built in 1070, despite wars and disasters, it has been preserved to remain ancient architectural styles of many dynasties as well as precious relics. Even though it costs a
unusually great in size or amount or degree or especially extent or scope
amount of country’s expenditure, Vietnamese’s authorities would not knock down for any reasons since
temple carries the value of the thousand-year culture.
On the other hand
, spending too much money on repairing old and unnecessary buildings is wasting the people’s taxes. In Vietnam’s countryside, there are numerous aged and obsolete bridges that children usually cross to go to school, which are really
for their safety. The regime of local bureaucracy only tries to repair those bridges in order to save budget.
, they do not concern about the quality and durability that lead to the consequence: more and more money spending
on maintenance the
on the maintenance
works. In
case, knocking down old buildings and constructing new ones would be more economical and effective choice. In conclusion, using national financial resource to preserve historical construction is the essential task of every
on reserving culture.
, we
need to spend it wisely depending on different kind of buildings.
Submitted by mrlightning.1512 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: