Ancient architecture and monuments are a way to delve into the past. It is believed that maintaining these physical structure costs high, it is rather better to invest in constructing latest buildings. I completely disagree with
essay will explain the reasons for the same.
A Primary reason why old buildings should be preserved, though it is an extra expenditure to the state is because they are the evidence of the past. Today when people visit to see them, they not only admire the beauty of the architecture, but
will be able to connect their understanding of the mythology. In a lot of books,
, the beauty of Taj Mahal, which is one of the historical buildings, is expressed by multiple authors.
, it would not have been possible to witness it, if we were unable to maintain it till date.
it is quite expensive, it is remarkable to preserve
Another element to invest on old constructions
of new one’s is that it attracts lots of tourist funds. While there is some exceptional heritage at certain locations, they attract global population as people tend to witness
unique masterpieces. Paris,
, derives exorbitant money from tourists as people from every part of the globe visit
place to experience Eiffel tower.
monuments consume funds to sustain, they very well have a capacity to retain the profits.
new buildings cost relatively less to be established, old buildings retain their own charm by demonstrating the existence of the past and bringing economic growth to certain places.
, spending for their sustenance is not in vain.