Contamination as well as different environmental obstacles
to be the direct result of countries development along with economic growth.Few individuals perceive that
According to my perceptional I firmly disagree to
with the given statement.My inclination along with justification would be explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
There are several
to support the arguments.The most valid argument is that; government
out a plan to mitigate is
is to say, proper planning and inspection from the administration can ensure the minimal emission of gas and other toxic elements into the water and air.
; if the jurisdiction does not take
on factory emission the problem of
will get worse.
and proper law and enforcement of laws can
cut down on; make a reduction in
it to a large extent. To elaborate, the greater percentage of environmental adulteration
by the human action. So that we should educate people, encourage them, enforce
save from ruin, destruction, or harm
in the world, it can be solved by growing
of trees. Because trees are able to clean the air, and absorb harmful gas
On the contrary
, I would not overlook the other side too.
with, the ultimate goal of any countries is increasing GDP. To support it can be explained that, increase. GDP would be achievable only by
industries to provide high quality product. If
, it would not only increase its
will soar the price of
but not least the effect of
and environmental issue
human health is so dangerous that it
be avoided. The reason is that
smog atmosphere generated the
of or relating to or caused by a toxin or poison
the air, which
the air which
increase the disease of lung and throat which affect humans.
to conclude the
said that, development and industrialization affect the environment.
industry to provide high quality of
, take actions on factory emissions and encourage them to enforce strict laws to make the world the better place for the future generations.