Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Learning about the past is a controversial topic.

Moreover

, it's argued that Gaining knowledge about the past is not of benefit to individuals who exist in the current generation.

This

essay will argue why,

this

is entirely inaccurate. Despite the great theoretical interest, knowing more about the previous times is not practically

important especially

Accept comma addition

important, especially

for the those who live in the present moment.

Furthermore

, it is claimed by some that

this

could be a huge waste of time.

For instance

, in Japan History is no longer a mandatory subject that children have to study

.

Accept space

.

Instead

, they focus more on those subjects that are of a living value.

Therefore

, it seems logical to believe that increasing what we know about what was it like a long time ago is not an add-value.

In contrast

, huge benefits could come from knowing more information about the previous human tenses. Because of the original experiences and different circumstances that people had to go through during their existing periods, we can change a lot in our present time for the better.

For example

, the

first

human being existed had to find a way to avoid cold weather, a reason why we invented clothes. It is for

these reason

Suggestion

this reason

these reasons

, it's easy to think that learning about the past is not only valuable, but

also

could let us know about things that would have been

otherwise

impossible to find out if we only had studied our present. In conclusion, it is believed by some people that it's not valuable to learn about our past.

This

essay argued why,

this

is completely preposterous. In my opinion, the past will always have much to teach us that it's not enough to be taught only by the present

.

Accept space

.