Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that richer nations should welcome more displaced people and assist them with essential life needs. I am in the favour of
this
idea because of humanitarian obligation and the economic stability of wealthy states. The most prominent reason why fortune countries should render supports is because of the human rights. According to the Universal Declaration of Human RIghts, all men and women should be entitled to all the rights and freedoms without distinction of any kind of reasons. No one wants to leave their homeland with their families unless it is essential to do so.
That is
to say, it is immoral not to help these people who fled from their war torn countries. A particularly good example here is the Syrian refugees, they try to
enter the
Accept comma addition
enter, the
more wealthy land because of the continuous famine and war. The
second
reason is that the affluent nations have abundant financial resources to aid those poorer states. Countries like USA, has a huge tax revenue from taxpayers every year. Taking a tiny fraction of
this
wealth to accommodate and feed millions of poor people would not impose any harmful effect on its economics.
For instance
, the European Union's combined GPD is over $18 trillion, and all displaced Syrians could be resettled for less than a billion dollars as long as the their economy is stable. In conclusion, affluent countries definitely should give more supports to refugees because it is moral to do so and they are wealthy enough to give. It is recommended that to do so.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Refugees
  • Asylum seekers
  • Humanitarian aid
  • Integration
  • Multiculturalism
  • Economic impact
  • Public services
  • International law
  • Conventions relating to the status of refugees
  • Labor market
  • Cultural enrichment
  • Burden-sharing
  • Resettlement programs
  • Host country
  • Border security
  • Comprehensive policy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: