1) Damage to environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement in the standard of living. To what degree do you agree or disagree to this position?

Climate

change

represents a major threat to life on earth. A certain segment argued that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with the statement, because I think we still have time to tackle

this

issue and reduce the human impact on the earth's

climate

There are myriad measures that governments and individuals could take to prevent or at least mitigate,

climate

change

. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that leads to global warming. They could impose " green taxes " on drivers, airline companies and other polluters and they could invest in renewable energy production from solar, wind and water power. As individuals, we should

also

try to limit our contribution to

climate

change

, by becoming more energy efficient, by using bicycles and public transport.

Moreover

, prevention and adaptation have to go on simultaneously to balance the

climate

change

. Expanding the statements, if

instead

of taking the above measures we simply try to

live

go away from a place

leave

the

climate

change

. I believe that the consequences will be disastrous. To epitomize, if we use more air-conditioners in the summers

then

, these luxuries may cause more pollution and global warming.

Therefore

, the rise in temperature may go exponential.

Additionally

, over the

last

decade, we have had the highest and the lowest ever recorded temperatures, the worst ever floods, the most devastating Storms

,

Accept space

,

hurricanes and tsunamis and many other natural disasters which are the direct result of

climate

change

. In conclusion, it can be reiterated that changes in the weather are occurring needs to be controlled.

Otherwise

, that day is not far, when there will be

litter

a substance used to ignite or kindle a fire

lighter

or no life on earth.