It is a commonly held belief that the death penalty is a good deterrent to prevent heinous crimes. However, others believe that life long sentence is a better deterrent. Discuss both views.

It is undoubtedly clear that every crime has to be punished and there are varying opinions on the method of punishments to be given for each felony. A good number of people believe that the ultimate penalty of death is the best option for heinous offence and they do even believe that

this

sentencing can prevent

such

actions. Some others believe in lifetime sentencing for atrocities. In

this

essay, I intend to delve into both the views on

this

heated topic.

First

of all, penalties should be in

such

a way that, it won’t be repeated in the future and

moreover

that, it should remind people the consequences or after effects and should keep the citizens away from committing the fault.

Secondly

, death warrant can be considered unsuitable punishment for several reasons. Right to live is the basic right of any human being, and no one can infringe

this

right, irrespective of the person’s deeds.

Furthermore

, innocent people can face wrongful execution. And

besides

, sometimes criminals repent of their acts. In

this

case, they should be given a

second

chance to improve themselves. As judicial execution can’t be revoked, it will be a wrong choice of disciplinary action.

Therefore

, the only viable privilege is to go for various modes of punishments depending on the intensity of the crime. For heinous crimes, life long sentencing is a better choice, where, the concerned can regret and can transform themselves.

On the other hand

, keeping the prisoners in the jail is costly in terms of security, workforce and other expenses

such

as food, shelter, etc.

In addition

, from an economic point of view, for a criminal to have millions spent on them, cannot be justified. Judicial killing is sometimes the best benefit as it lessens the governmental expenses, frightens people and

thus

prevent them from doing the misdeed in future.

For example

, most of the countries have implemented the execution as the capital punishment for those caught in terrorist activities. In India, one among the terrorists is executed in 2016, by considering the legalised killing is the ultimate forfeiture. To sum up, there are pros and cons to both death penalty and a life sentence. Developing morality in citizens

from

Suggestion

of

the school time can lessen

the case rate

Suggestion

the rate case

. A moralistic civic can create a better nation where the intensity of offence will be less, where, the decision of the judiciary on the mode of trial can be asserted.