Many people regard the film as less important art forms than literature and paintings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the other

art

Use synonyms

forms are considered more significant as compared to movies by the masses. I am

completly

to a complete degree or to the full or entire extent

completely

against the notion because cinema is one of the best sources to convey information, and even illiterate individuals can learn through it. To commence with, films are the best way to portray any story and event that occurred in the history because the visuals not only create interest of people in the story, but

also

Linking Words

help them to understand the situation.

For example

Linking Words

, in a recent survey, it is found that almost 70 percent of people in the world watch movies to learn about history rather than reading it from the books because they find it difficult to read and understand, so they prefer cinema.

Hence

Linking Words

, films play a substantial role to convey information.

Moreover

Linking Words

, movies can cater to a larger audience than other

art

Use synonyms

forms as the maximum number of people prefer to watch it rather than going to any exhibition.

Besides

Linking Words

, the illiterate masses can

also

Linking Words

learn about history and culture through it.

For instance

Linking Words

, the literacy rate in India is approximately 70 percent, and these literate people can read about their forefathers from the books, but the rest 30 percent cannot do it since they do not know how to read.

Consequently

Linking Words

, films are essential to display the past.

Therefore

Linking Words

, it is apparent that movies are

also

Linking Words

a significant form of

art

Use synonyms

. To summarize, literature and paintings are an excellent form of

art

Use synonyms

,

however

Linking Words

less important as compared with the cinema. In my opinion, movies are necessary as it portrays the events as well as helps everyone to gain knowledge.