Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country rather than the literature and history of other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

People have different ideas about learning past events and the

literature

of their nation. I personally believe learning

literature

and

history

of their own

country

is as significant as learning

history

and

literature

of other nations.

To begin

with children are taught about their

history

and

literature

of their

country

they can learn where they live and born and by learning the past events and the culture of their

country

's sense of identity happens

as a result

of knowing their

history

and it gives a thematic sense of roots and belonging.

For example

, children who read poems of their countries can recognize great people and the ancestors of their

country

.

Consequently

, children can be more familiar with their own

country

by knowing more stories behind the nation through studying

history

and

literature

which showed patterns of behaviour or events in the past and their outcome which can help them avoid similar outcomes in the future. On the other viewpoints, learning other countries´ culture, it can vital nowadays because of growing technology and globalization people connect more with other people all over the world. In the other word, the level of communication and relationship between countries has increased internationally.

For instance

, travelling increase and people visit other countries

such

as French and German and children if want to migrate in the future should learn and study

literature

and values of other countries.

This

will make it easier for them to adapt in those countries. In conclusion, in my opinion learning

history

and culture of their county it can be more important.

However

, studying and teaching

history

and

literature

of other countries during

this

day because of changing people, s lifestyle is crucial.