Scientific research should be funded by governments rather than commercial organisations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Scientific

research

plays a very important role in the progress of the nation. It is argued that

this

inclination should be controlled and financed by the national authority than the private sector. I strongly agree with

this

phenomenon and in the ensuing paragraphs I will allude to these arguments

further

. There are numerous reasons to support my viewpoint.

To begin

with, scientific exploration

such

as space exploration, nuclear weapons tests, and new medicine experiments, these require enormous capital and

security

. The government is capable of providing financial assistance to various

research

projects.

Moreover

, if the project fails to achieve its objects, the authority has to cope up with the losses.

Furthermore

, when government funds

research

activities, there is utmost

security

. They do not disclose any information, which could hamper national preservation. Foe example, nuclear weapons tests are very important for any countries,

however

,

this

type of

research

is supervised by the government due to

security

purpose. If governments are controlling exploration projects, they would have a safe hand.

On the contrary

, when private organisations conduct

research

, there are some significant dangers in it.

First

, private companies invest a lump sum of money in studies, it takes a longer time for the expected results.

For example

, companies that produce medicinal drugs legally go through rigorous trails, which may take several years to complete.

Finally

, it does not provide sufficient

security

in

this

research

.

Hence

, there are some reasons for

this

trend. In conclusion, I reckon that analysis in science should be operated by the union to protect and to boost up scientific

research

. Private organization, have their own interest, which is dangerous.