Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree

It is argued that high-income countries should provide humanitarian assistance to their poorer counterparts during natural catastrophes.
This
essay agrees with
this
statement because poor nations do not have enough resources to deal with
such
circumstances and foreign aid can
also
accelerate their recovery. Middle and low-income countries do not have sufficient money and infrastructure to assist their communities during a natural disaster.
This
can lead to many preventable deaths and potentiate the negative impact on people’s
life
Suggestion
live
.
Moreover
, when
such
catastrophes happen, the large number of people who need urgent help and the environmental damage that
difficults
not easy; requiring great physical or mental effort to accomplish or comprehend or endure
difficult
difficulties
the access to the area make the task very expensive and logistically challenging.
For instance
, the financial support and the humanitarian assistance given to Haiti by wealthier nations during the 2012s earthquake were pivotal to save hundreds of human lives. Tsunamis, earthquakes and storms can destroy entire cities and it is almost impossible for undeveloped countries to rebuild and regain growth by themselves. Rich nations assistance can provide the adequate support to achieve a faster
infrastructural
and economic recovery. To illustrate, the international help provided to Thailand after a tsunami, which destroyed many islands, hit the country’s coast in 2008 was one of the major aspects that made possible the impressive development that
this
nation has presented in the
last
years. In summary, high-income nations need to help poorer ones during environmental disasters. Undeveloped countries have very limited resources to face these challenges and international aid can save many lives and optimize their capacity to recover
Submitted by chukwudionyeonwu2 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Humanitarian relief
  • Infrastructure
  • Global solidarity
  • Disproportionately
  • External assistance
  • Rebuilding efforts
  • Disaster response
  • Investment in stability
  • Dependency theory
  • Responsible intervention
  • Paternalistic
  • Shared humanity
  • Sovereignty
  • Capabilities
  • Fatality rates
What to do next:
Look at other essays: