some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some people argue that the issues related to

environment

Suggestion

the environment

should be resolved globally, others are of the opinion that these should be tackled at the national

level

. Either way certainly has its own appeal, but I would strongly support the latter because the nations could have different priorities. Some people stress on the resolution of

environment

Suggestion

environmental

related problems faced by the

world

today on a global

scale

.

In other words

issues like global warming, deforestation,

etc

continuing in the same way

etc.

are faced at global

level

and needs immediate attention to reduce the heavy impact these make on our living.

For

example widespread

Accept comma addition

example, widespread

floods on

coast lines

the outline of a coast

coastlines

, storms and famines are the real challenges faced by humans all over the

world

.

Thus it

Accept comma addition

Thus, it

needs solution

at

Suggestion

on

a global

scale

.

Also

the presence of global body like United Nations ensures that solutions to

such

problems can be streamlined at global

scale

. Others support dealing with the environmental hazards at national

level

.

This

is because the administration of different countries or regions have different mindset towards the issues.

This

is due to the different nature of

issues

Suggestion

the issues

faced by the countries all over the

world

. Some countries,

for instance

, are facing human resources or manpower issues along with environmental issues.

Thus

, here the government would be coining strategies to tackle issues that

needs

Suggestion

need

quick resolution. While other countries would be facing environmental issues more often so their administration would be running intense programs to solve those issues nationally. In my opinion, solving these issues nationally is preferred as most of the countries are underdeveloped or developing and need to prioritize their aid towards areas that need immediate help.

For

example some

Accept comma addition

example, some

countries are working on literacy programs, while others are focusing on poverty

allevition

the feeling that comes when something burdensome is removed or reduced

alleviation

missions.

Therefore

, solving environmental issues at the national

level

would help the

world

in a real way rather than trying to solve it at global

scale

which could be a hypothetical situation due to the lack of will power of some countries that are facing other non environmental issues. In conclusion, some are in

favor

promote over another

favour

of solving issues globally, while others are into national

level

resolutions due to reasons stated above.

However

, due to the different priorities of different national

governments it would

Suggestion

governments, it would

not be easy to run solutions at global

scale

rather the efforts towards environmental stability would be fruitful if tackled nationally.