When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

Technology has played a significant role in human’s life. As a nation gradually improves on it, the old techniques and lifestyle descends. In my opinion, I somewhat disagree with the proposition,

although

it has benefits, but keeping them in practise is not futile. To commence with, nowadays we see every nation is in a race to improve their expertise and implementing it in almost all quotidian activities improving our way of living.

For example

, if we take education system in India, way back it was much an old fashioned classroom with a blackboard, which now turned into and audio visual hall using high tech gadgets for teaching.

Nevertheless it

Accept comma addition

Nevertheless, it

has enhanced the way of learning, and often children learn it easily, which was cumbersome beforehand. But it

also

leads students to rely onto particular medium, annihilating their ability to visualise and focus on understanding the text. Apparently sticking to the old pattern and not implementing the latest techniques of learning

also

retracts them from the modern world, so infusing both could rather succumb better result.

For instance

, many brain development tutors help the children to solve mathematics on the basis of abacus and finger counts, churning excellent outcomes

moreover

kindles them to rely on it, even from a below average child. In conclusion, as we see technology is meant to succour our life, but as a natural propensity humans thrall over it, so rather inundating it, using it wisely balances resulting, so it vindicates that keeping them active, is never considered worthless but improvises the ability of functioning.